Technical Writing

The Real Reason Your AI Agent Keeps Hallucinating (It’s Not the Model)

AI agents hallucinate not because models are dumb, but because they lack real-time access to current documentation. An MCP server bridges that gap, turning agents from stale-training-data guessers into grounded retrievers. The real strategic asset isn’t the model — it’s the documentation layer. Whoever controls clean, machine-readable context controls how useful AI becomes.

Stop Fine-Tuning Your LLM. You’re Solving the Wrong Problem.

Just mentioning ASD-STE100—a notoriously strict aerospace style guide—in your prompt gets 72% compliance from an LLM with zero fine-tuning. The model already internalized the rules. The real bottleneck in AI content quality isn’t model capability or training infrastructure. It’s how specifically you articulate what you want. Most output problems are articulation failures, not capability failures.

The AMD MI355X Benchmark That Was Ruined by AI Slop (And What It Says About Tech Content Today)

A wafer.ai benchmark comparing AMD’s MI355X to Nvidia’s B300 goes viral for all the wrong reasons: the article is obvious AI slop, complete with em-dashes and robotic phrasing. The irony is that the data might be solid, but the AI-generated presentation destroys the credibility of the hardware it’s trying to promote. This case study proves that in technical communication, the medium is the message — and slop kills trust.

The Hidden Reason Your Docs Suck (And It’s Not Your Writing)

Most documentation is terrible not because writers lack skill, but because they mix tutorials, how-to guides, explanations, and references into one confusing mess. Diátaxis fixes this by separating content into four distinct cognitive modes—learning, doing, understanding, referencing—so readers get exactly what they need, when they need it. If you’ve ever struggled with unclear docs, this framework will change how you write and consume them.

I Tamed AI’s Verbosity with a 50-Year-Old Standard. Here’s How.

AI-generated text is bloated and ambiguous. By forcing AI agents to write in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English, we reverse the problem: using extreme complexity to achieve extreme simplicity. The result? Crisp, unambiguous instructions that save time and reduce errors. This isn’t about making AI smarter—it’s about making it shut up and say exactly what it means.

The Boring Language Rule That Prevents Plane Crashes — And Almost Nobody Uses It

Simplified Technical English limits vocabulary to 900 words and bans synonyms — not to dumb things down, but to make misreading impossible. Born in aerospace, STE cuts translation costs by up to 40%, eliminates interpretation drift across global supply chains, and creates documentation that holds up in court. Most companies ignore it. The ones who don’t are the ones who can’t afford ambiguity.

The ‘Doom on Everything’ Hack Is Dead. AI Killed It.

The latest ‘Doom on regex engine’ hack is technically brilliant, but the writeup screams AI-generation. That suspicion is killing the cultural value of the ‘Doom on X’ meme—because the genre was never about the game, it was about the human story of struggle and ingenuity. When AI does the thinking, the achievement becomes hollow.

Stop Writing Documentation for Humans. Or AI. Do This Instead.

Most teams think they have to choose between writing documentation for human comprehension or AI indexing. It’s a false dichotomy. The same design principles—clear hierarchy, consistent labeling, and semantic structure—that make docs readable for tired developers are exactly what make them parseable for AI agents. Stop compromising and start building for clarity.

The AI Skill You Already Have (But Keep Ignoring)

If you can write acceptance criteria for a feature, you can write an AI routing policy. The cognitive muscle is identical: break down desired behavior into clear, conditional rules. The real barrier isn’t technical—it’s the courage to admit you already have the tools. This article reframes AI governance as a familiar skill transfer, empowering product managers and developers to take ownership without waiting for data scientists.