Lisp

Stop Calling It ‘Friendly’: The Brutal Truth About Learning Racket

A blog post titled “A Friendly Introduction to Racket” sparked frustration by introducing complex syntax and lambda functions right out of the gate. But this isn’t just a bad tutorial; it reveals a fundamental truth about learning Lisp. Racket isn’t hard because it’s complex. It’s hard because it forces you to unlearn everything you know about modern programming.

The JVM Was Never the Point: Why Jolt Changes Everything for Clojure

Jolt is a Clojure compiler that targets Chez Scheme, producing small, self-contained native binaries without the JVM. It challenges the assumption that Clojure’s identity depends on its runtime. For developers, it means fast startup, tiny deploys, and the same powerful semantics. The real disruption: the JVM was always optional.

Lisp’s Most Sacred Functions Are a 1950s Hardware Hack Nobody Bothered to Rename

CAR and CDR β€” the two most fundamental functions in Lisp β€” aren’t elegant mathematical abstractions. They’re named after hardware registers on the IBM 704, a machine from the 1950s that hasn’t run in decades. The ‘purest’ language in computer science is built on pragmatic hardware hacks that survived purely through inertia. And that tells you everything about how software actually evolves.

The 1981 Editor That’s Still Beating Modern Tools (And It’s Not Even Close)

Emacs (1981) isn’t just a text editorβ€”it’s a Lisp machine disguised as one. Its architecture anticipated modern plugin ecosystems while offering deeper integration than any tool today. The learning curve is brutal, but the payoff is agency: the ability to reshape your editor into an extension of your mind. This article explains why Emacs is still the most modern editor you’re not using, and why its philosophy matters more than ever.

Lisp Already Won. You Just Don’t Know It Yet.

Lisp isn’t just a programming language β€” it’s the mathematical boundary of what software can be. Modern languages like Python and JavaScript are slowly rediscovering features Lisp had in 1958. This article argues that Lisp’s true victory is not in market share but in shaping the fundamental ideas that every developer now relies on, often without knowing it.